August 2025

A tour through the brain’s code: interneuron teamwork, speed-boosted navigation, dopamine-shaped learning, compositional maps, and value-sensitive choices

Cooperative actions of interneuron families support the hippocampal spatial code

Interneuron cooperation
  • Methods: Multi-shank silicon probes + optogenetic tagging of four interneuron families (Pvalb, Sst, Vip, Id2) in hippocampus and neocortex.
  • Classification: Machine learning on physiological fingerprints achieved >89% accuracy, bridging genetics and in vivo physiology.
  • Findings: Distinct interneuron families differentially sculpt pyramidal place fields; Pvalb suppressed early spikes, Sst/Id2 suppressed late, suggesting time-division control.
  • Conclusion: Cooperative interneuron interactions are central to the hippocampal spatial map, beyond excitatory synaptic plasticity.

Speed modulations in grid cell information geometry

Speed modulation of grid coding
  • Approach: Introduced Gaussian Process with Kernel Regression (GKR) to model neural manifolds + noise covariance in grid cell populations.
  • Manifold dilation: Faster running speed stretched the toroidal-like manifold of grid codes.
  • Noise trade-off: Noise also increased, but information gain from dilation outpaced noise costs.
  • Result: Fisher information and decoding accuracy improved at higher speeds, while noise correlations projecting onto the manifold impaired coding.
  • Implication: Population-level coding, not just single cells, explains why navigation accuracy improves with movement speed.

Tonic dopamine and biases in value learning

Tonic dopamine and biased value learning
  • Problem: Psychiatric disorders often feature biased future predictions (pessimism in depression, optimism in addiction).
  • Model: RL framework with basal ganglia circuit architecture + dopamine receptor pharmacodynamics.
  • Mechanism: Differences in D1 vs. D2 receptor affinities and sigmoidal dose–response curves mean tonic dopamine shifts sensitivity to positive vs. negative reward prediction errors.
  • Evidence: Explains optimistic and pessimistic learning in both humans and mice.
  • Significance: Provides a biologically grounded mechanism linking tonic dopamine to learning biases and psychiatric symptoms.

Reconciling flexibility and efficiency: compositional cognitive maps in MEC

Compositional maps in MEC
  • Model: Cognitive maps constructed from predictive object representations (PORs) perturbing a baseline open-space grid.
  • Composition: PORs are translation/rotation invariant and recombinable, enabling efficient compositional map building.
  • Neural mapping:
    • Object vector cells = encode POR building blocks.
    • Grid cells = baseline efficient spatial metric.
  • Insight: MEC supports planning-ready compositional maps, reconciling flexible recombination with efficient path planning.

Competitive integration of time and reward in foraging

Frontal cortex integration of time and reward
  • Task: Head-fixed mice performed a VR patch-foraging paradigm with probabilistic, diminishing water rewards.
  • Behavioral model: Mice integrated elapsed time (positive contribution) vs. received rewards (negative contribution), scaled by a latent patience state.
  • Deviation from theory: Decisions systematically diverged from Marginal Value Theorem but were captured by competitive integration models.
  • Neural evidence: Neuropixels across frontal cortex showed ramping activity encoding the integrated decision variable, oppositely modulated by time vs. reward.
  • Conclusion: Frontal ramping dynamics provide a neural substrate for value-sensitive patch leaving.